Get Free Teaser
Announced record · Verified 22 Oct 2026

Yotta — Uttarpara, West BengalYotta Data Services (Hiranandani Group) · Uttarpara, Hooghly · announced 250 MW

Record PRJ-037West Bengal — Uttarpara, HooghlyTier B — announced only9 public sources cross-checked
AnnouncedZero MW deliveredCampus proposalAdditivity unresolved
100ac
Site
6
Buildings planned
250 → 160MW
Claim moved
₹8,500cr
Announced
5yr 8mo
Since announcement
0
Megawatts built

On 15 February 2021 the Hiranandani Group announced it would buy a 100-acre site from Hindustan Motors at Uttarpara in Hooghly district, west of Kolkata, and build six Yotta hyperscale data centres totalling 250 MW for about ₹8,500 crore. The first building was to be ready in 2023. Five years and eight months later, no construction has been evidenced, no megawatt has been delivered, and the project's own leadership has twice described the capacity as 180 MW and 160 MW. This record is short because the public record is short.

1At a glance

Operator
Yotta Data Services, Hiranandani Group. The adjacent logistics park is developed by Greenbase, a Hiranandani and Blackstone joint venture
Site
100 acres at Uttarpara, Hooghly district, West Bengal, acquired from Hindustan Motors. About 20 acres were designated for the data centre park
Announced
15 February 2021, under a memorandum with the Government of West Bengal
Announced capacity
250 MW across six Yotta buildings
Announced investment
₹8,500 crore of direct group investment, with a further ₹1,500 crore from associates and customers taking the combined figure to about ₹10,000 crore
First building
Stated for 2023. Later restated as "before the 2025 target"
Status
Announced. No construction evidenced. Government listings still record the project as planned
Additivity
Flagged unresolved in the registry. It contributes nothing to any total because nothing exists
Confidence
High on the announcement and the land. Low on everything after 2022

2The promise

The announcement was large and precise, which is what makes it worth tracking.

Land
100 acres bought from Hindustan Motors at Uttarpara — a closed car plant site, not a greenfield plot
Split
About 20 acres for the data centre park, the remainder for an industrial and logistics park of roughly three million square feet
Data centre scope
Six hyper-connected buildings, 250 MW, developed over several years
Money
₹8,500 crore direct; about ₹10,000 crore including associates and customer investment
Partners
Greenbase, a joint venture between Hiranandani and Blackstone, delivering the logistics half
First delivery
Logistics facility by June 2022, first data centre by 2023

The structure is the same one Yotta used in Greater Noida: a large land parcel bought from a state government or a distressed industrial owner, a state memorandum, a multi-building plan and a headline megawatt number. In Greater Noida that structure produced a live building in 20 months. In Bengal it has produced nothing in five years and eight months.

3The capacity that shrank

AnnouncementFebruary 2021250 MWProject director, December 2022IT load, 30,000 racks180 MWSame week, second officialcommissioning commentary160 MWDeliveredas of October 20260 MWEvery figure on the left was published by the project's own side. None of it was built.
Figure 1Three different capacities, all from the project's own side, published within 22 months of each other. Then zero.
How the West Bengal capacity was described over time
SourceDateFigureWhat changed
Announcement coverage15 Feb 2021250 MWSix buildings, ₹8,500 crore
Project leadership, press briefing1 Dec 2022180 MWDescribed as "30,000 racks with an IT load of 180 MW" on the 20-acre data centre portion
Second official, same periodDec 2022about 160 MWCapacity "could be around 160 MW", commissioned by 2025
Current reference listingsOct 2026250 MW, plannedThe original figure, still carried, with the project still at planning stage

The December 2022 briefing is the most useful document on this project. It gave a rack count and an IT-load figure for the first time — 30,000 racks, 180 MW — and reduced the site from 100 acres to 20 acres for the data centre portion. It also admitted the project had been "moving slowly" and explained why: the design was being changed to a maximum of ground plus two floors instead of a multi-storey building, expressly to speed delivery.

Why the number and the design moved together

Floors are a load problem. Height is a structural, cooling and vertical-transport problem. A G+2 design is faster to build and cheaper per megawatt, and it is what you switch to when you are behind.

It also admits the multi-storey plan was wrong for the site. Four years after that admission, the G+2 building has not been built either.

4Five years, nothing built

MoU01Land02Redesign03Construction04Fitting out05Live06Navy = verified · Red = current stage · Grey = not yet evidenced
Figure 2Delivery stages for the Uttarpara park. The first three are documented. Nothing has moved past the third.

The evidence of absence is as strong as this kind of record can be made. As of October 2026:

Government status
West Bengal government reference listings record the Hiranandani capacity as 250 MW at Uttarpara, status planned
Market trackers
One major data centre directory marks the Kolkata park listing as no longer active
Operator silence
No Yotta release, investor document or interview since 2022 has given a construction date, cost, tenant or revised target for Bengal
Capital allocation
Every subsequent Yotta announcement has been Greater Noida, Navi Mumbai, Guwahati or overseas. Bengal has not appeared
Land
The land deal with Hindustan Motors was signed and reported. Whether it completed, and on what terms, is not public
What would change this
A construction start, a contractor award, a state approval or a site photograph. None has appeared

Gridvik records this project as announced because that is what it is. It is not recorded as cancelled, because nothing has said so. It is recorded as a live claim that has produced no evidence for four years — which is the most accurate thing that can be said about it.

5Why Bengal was left behind

West Bengal offered a genuine policy case. Its data centre policy, notified in September 2021, provides 100% exemption on stamp duty and registration fees and a five-year electricity duty waiver. On a ₹8,500 crore project that is not a trivial concession.

What Bengal did not have was Yotta's attention. Between 2022 and 2026 the group committed to:

Where the group's capital and management actually went
ProjectCommittedStatus now
Greater Noida park, Uttar Pradesh₹39,000 crore memorandumOne of six buildings live, 28.8 MW
Navi Mumbai campus600 acres, described as scalable to 2 GWOperating; the group's GPU centre of gravity
GuwahatiAnnounced for 2024Delivered later than stated
Blackwell Ultra GPU deploymentmore than $2 billionUnder construction, target slipped
Uttarpara, West Bengal₹8,500 croreNothing built

The competitive picture makes it harder. Eastern India's data-centre build has concentrated in New Town and the Bengal Silicon Valley hub, where Reliance Jio with Microsoft, Bharti Airtel, Adani and LTIMindtree are all building on state-provided land. Uttarpara sits roughly 30 kilometres north of that cluster, on a former car plant, without the anchor-tenant gravity the New Town hub has acquired.

The honest read

West Bengal is the project that Yotta's pivot to AI compute made irrelevant. A company racing to get 60 MW of liquid-cooled GPU halls live in Greater Noida does not start a G+2 colocation park in Hooghly.

The useful signal is not that the project is dead. It is that announced capacity in India has an expiring value. A 250 MW announcement from 2021 that has built nothing should be treated as zero — and most market summaries still count it.

6Timeline

  • Hiranandani Group signs a memorandum with the Government of West Bengal for an integrated logistics and data centre park at Uttarpara. 100 acres from Hindustan Motors. ₹8,500 crore direct investment; about ₹10,000 crore including associates. Six Yotta buildings, 250 MW. First data centre targeted for 2023.
  • First Greenbase logistics facility targeted for completion.
  • West Bengal data centre policy notified: full stamp duty and registration exemption, five-year electricity duty waiver.
  • Project leadership states the Bengal project has been "moving slowly", that the design is being changed to a maximum of ground plus two floors to speed rollout, and that the data centre portion is 20 acres with 30,000 racks and an IT load of 180 MW. Capacity that week is also described as about 160 MW, commissioned by 2025.
  • No construction milestone, contractor award, state approval, tenant or revised date is published. Every subsequent group announcement concerns other sites.
  • Still at planning stage. Zero megawatts delivered. Five years and eight months after the announcement.
  • Any evidence that the land transaction completed, any construction start, any revised schedule

7Assumptions and what we refuse to invent

What is sourced
The date and parties of the memorandum, the land and its vendor, the acreage and its split, the six-building plan, the 250 MW announcement, the ₹8,500 crore and ₹10,000 crore figures, the December 2022 restatement to 180 MW and 160 MW, the G+2 design change, the state policy incentives, and the current planned status
What is derived
Per-megawatt cost under three different capacity denominators, the comparison with the New Town cluster, and the assessment of why the project stalled
Capacity figure used
None as delivered capacity. The 250 MW is a 2021 announcement and is treated as a claim, not a number
Additivity rule
Flagged unresolved. It contributes to no total. It is not counted as live, building or announced capacity in any Gridvik aggregate
Cost per MW
₹34 crore at 250 MW, ₹47 crore at 180 MW, ₹53 crore at 160 MW. The spread is what happens when the denominator is a promise
Currency
₹88.40 to the US dollar, fixed quarterly
What we refuse to do
We will not fill this page. There is no site plan, no design, no supplier, no tenant and no schedule in the public record, so none appears here. A short page is the correct outcome

8Limits and open questions

The central gap
No evidence of construction at any point in five years and eight months. That is the finding, not a gap in the research
Land
Whether the 100-acre purchase from Hindustan Motors completed, at what price and on what payment terms, is not public
Cancellation
The project has never been publicly cancelled or deferred. It has simply stopped being mentioned, which is different and harder to price
Capacity basis
The 250 MW was never stated as IT load or gross. The 180 MW was stated as IT load. They are not the same measure
Cost
₹8,500 crore covers the group's direct investment in both the data centre and logistics parks. The data-centre-only figure has never been published
Tenants
None named at any point
What we will not claim
No cancellation, no restart, no completion, no construction status, no equipment brands, and no megawatts. Nothing on this page should be read as a forecast that the project will be built

9Sources

This record was compiled entirely from publicly available sources, cross-checked against one another.

DatacenterDynamics·Business Standard·Economic Times·The Hindu BusinessLine·NDTV Profit·Telegraph India·Times of India (PTI)·West Bengal government listings·Data Center Map

Gridvik does not publish source URLs on record pages; citations are retained in the internal source register and are available on request.

What this page is, and what it is not

This is a short record of a large announcement that has produced nothing visible in five years and eight months. It is published as short deliberately, because padding it would require inventing things.

Corrections are free and published with a date.