Get Free Teaser
Facility record · Enriched · Verified 22 Oct 2026

Equinix CN1 — ChennaiEquinix India · SIPCOT IT Park, Siruseri, Tamil Nadu · 3.6 MW live

Record PRJ-047Tamil Nadu — SiruseriTier A — procurement-relevantTier III+ design claim13 public sources cross-checked
Live and expandingFacility recordAdditive to national totalMegawatts never published by the operator
3.6MW
Live IT load
800
Cabinets live
4,250–4,950
Cabinets at full build
~25MW
Planned IT load
$69m
Initial investment
6ac
Site

Equinix opened its first Chennai data centre on 19 September 2025, on nearly six acres of SIPCOT land at Siruseri, twenty-eight kilometres from the central business district and close to anticipated submarine cable landings. The press release gave 800 cabinets in phase one and 4,250 cabinets at full build. The company’s own executives said 850 and 4,950. What almost nobody printed is the number that makes the building legible: 3.6 MW of IT load live, rising to roughly 25 MW. Equinix, like most global colocation operators, sells cabinets. Convert them and the building becomes comparable with everything else in this market.

1At a glance

Operator
Equinix, the world’s largest data centre company by revenue, listed on Nasdaq. CN1 is its first International Business Exchange in Chennai and its fifth in India
Location
SIPCOT IT Park, Siruseri, Tamil Nadu. Nearly six acres. About 28 kilometres from the Chennai central business district
Why Siruseri
Near anticipated submarine cable landing sites, and inside an established IT corridor. Equinix connects it to its own Mumbai campus by dark fibre
Opened
19 September 2025, inaugurated by the Tamil Nadu chief minister
Live capacity
3.6 MW of IT load and 800 cabinets. Described by the company as about 850 customer cabinets
Full build
A four-storey building. 4,250 cabinets in the press release, 4,950 in company statements, with an IT load of roughly 25 MW
Investment
US$69 million initial, about ₹610 crore at ₹88.40 to the dollar. Reported elsewhere as ₹574 crore
Design
99.999% uptime target, diverse fibre paths, and built to support liquid cooling for high-density workloads
Power
A dedicated substation is being developed adjacent to the site by the state utility
Registry note
Equinix does not publish megawatts in these releases. The 3.6 MW and 25 MW figures come from company statements in press coverage, not from the press release

2The capacity the press release left out

What CN1 is, by measure
MeasureFigureSource and caveat
IT load, live3.6 MWState coverage of the opening, attributing the figure to the company
IT load, full buildabout 25 MWCompany statements in trade coverage
Cabinets, live800Equinix press release
Cabinets, live850Company statements reported in trade coverage
Cabinets, full build4,250Equinix press release
Cabinets, full build4,950Company statements reported in trade coverage
Sitenearly 6 acresEquinix press release
Storeys4Equinix press release
Initial investmentUS$69 millionEquinix press release
Investment in rupees₹574 croreIndian trade coverage, on the day of opening

This is the central observation of the record, and it is a general one about the sector. Equinix reports cabinets and investment. It does not report megawatts. The company is not being evasive — cabinets are the correct unit for what it sells, which is retail colocation space with interconnection attached to it. But it means the largest data centre company in the world is almost invisible in a market that counts megawatts.

Gridvik’s rule for this operator

Record the published figure, state the unit, and derive nothing into the registry that the operator has not said.

The 3.6 MW live is accepted because it is attributed to the company in state coverage and is arithmetically consistent with the cabinet count. The 25 MW at full build is recorded as a plan, not a capacity.

3Four cabinet numbers

Phase 1, press release19 September 2025800 cabinetsPhase 1, company statements2024 to 2025850 cabinetsFull build, press release19 September 20254,250 cabinetsFull build, company statements2024 to 20254,950 cabinetsTwo pairs of numbers, published by the same company about the same building, differing by 50 and by 700.
Figure 1Both pairs come from Equinix. The lower figure in each pair is from the formal press release; the higher is from company statements reproduced in trade coverage.

There is a mundane explanation, and it is the right one. Press releases are written months before the event and cleared through legal. The 800 was the committed handover count. By opening day the usable cabinet count was 850, and the longer-term master plan had been refined from 4,250 to 4,950 as the design developed.

Both numbers are honest. They are simply measuring two different stages of the same building’s life. Gridvik records 800 as built and carries the higher figures as plan.

4The figures that do reconcile

Phase 1 as commissioned3.6 MW over 800 cabinets4.5 kWFull build, 4,250 cabinets25 MW5.88 kWFull build, 4,950 cabinets25 MW5.05 kWFor comparison: Yotta D1already built5.76 kWThree different pairs of numbers converge on the same density. That is how you know the 25 MW figure is real.
Figure 1Density derived from published load and cabinet counts. All three converge, which is the strongest available evidence that the 25 MW figure is a real design number rather than a marketing one.

Here is the check worth doing on any facility whose operator publishes cabinets instead of megawatts.

The density arithmetic
ConfigurationLoadCabinetskW per cabinet
Phase 1 as commissioned3.6 MW8004.50
Full build, lower cabinet count25 MW4,2505.88
Full build, higher cabinet count25 MW4,9505.05

Three different pairs of published numbers land within 1.4 kW per cabinet of each other. That consistency is not a coincidence: it is what happens when a real design exists behind the numbers. It also tells you what the building is. CN1 is a five kilowatt retail colocation facility, which is the mainstream of the Indian market and not an AI hall.

For comparison, Yotta’s D1 works out at 5.76 kW per rack and Avisirah’s new Navi Mumbai facility is specified at 5 kW. The three most differently positioned projects in the registry converge on the same density, because that is where Indian enterprise demand actually sits.

5What a megawatt costs in retail colocation

Cost per megawatt of installed capacity, very different buildings
ProjectInvestmentLive or built capacityPer MW
Equinix CN1, phase 1US$69 million3.6 MWabout US$19.2 million
Equinix MB3 Mumbai, phase 1US$95 millionabout 6.9 MW derivedabout US$13.9 million
Yotta D1₹1,500 crore28.8 MWabout US$5.9 million
Nxtra’s disclosed standard——about US$10.3 million

Retail colocation costs three times a hyperscale build per megawatt, and there are three honest reasons.

First, phase one pays for the whole shell. CN1’s 800 cabinets sit inside a four-storey building designed for 4,250 or more. If the full build cost scales proportionally, the implied cost per megawatt at 25 MW is a fraction of the phase-one figure.

Second, retail means small deployments. The engineering that lets forty customers share a hall costs more per megawatt than one tenant filling a building.

Third, and most important, the megawatt is not what is being sold. Equinix is selling interconnection — Equinix Fabric, direct connections to AWS, Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure and Oracle, and access to five internet exchanges in India. That is the product, and it is priced per port and per cross-connect, not per kilowatt.

What this means for a supplier pricing into Equinix

Do not use hyperscale cost benchmarks. A retail colocation build has more, smaller electrical and mechanical systems, more redundancy, and more metering — and it is built for a customer base that pays for reliability rather than scale.

The relevant competitive fact is that Equinix spent $365 million in India across five buildings by April 2026 and is publicly looking to buy more Mumbai land. It is the most reliable repeat buyer of premium plant in the country.

6The building and the site

Structure
Four storeys on nearly six acres of SIPCOT land at Siruseri, in the southern IT corridor of Chennai
Why the site was chosen
The India managing director said Chennai made sense for three reasons: an existing IT corridor and enterprise base, proximity to cable landing sites, and a state government that moved quickly on permissions. He said the company lost little time to approvals
Subsea connectivity
Close to anticipated submarine cable landing stations. Chennai is India’s principal subsea gateway, and Equinix’s proposition is built on being where cables land
Power
The state transmission utility is developing a dedicated substation adjacent to the site. This is the arrangement that determines the site’s ultimate capacity
Cooling
Designed to support liquid cooling for high-density workloads, which is a readiness claim rather than an installed capability at 5 kW per cabinet
Interconnection
Equinix Fabric and Fabric Cloud Router, giving direct interconnection with partners and hybrid multicloud infrastructure
What it is connected to
The company’s Mumbai campus of three further IBX buildings, plus more than 270 data centres globally
Uptime target
99.999%, the standard Equinix design criterion

The comparison worth making is with Sify’s Chennai 02 campus, which Gridvik recorded at 25.92 MW built and which contains an on-site open cable landing station. Chennai now has two operators of very different scale competing on the same premise: being the building nearest the cables.

7What AI-ready means here

"AI-ready" is on the cover of the press release. At 4.5 kilowatts per cabinet on day one, it is worth being precise about what the claim does and does not mean.

The claim against the specification
ClaimWhat is evidenced
AI-readyDesigned to accommodate liquid cooling. No liquid-cooled racks are described as installed
High-density workloads5 kW per cabinet average as built. High density in this market begins above 20 kW and AI training is above 60
Liquid cooling supportA design provision. The coolant distribution units, rear-door heat exchangers or direct-to-chip loops would be added when a customer orders them
Scalable for AIFair. The building has four storeys and a 25 MW design, and could host dense halls if power and cooling were provisioned per floor

That is not a criticism of Equinix. Designing for liquid cooling before there is demand for it is the right call, and it is what separates a building that can be upgraded from one that cannot. The honest statement is that CN1 is AI-capable by design and colocation-dense by configuration.

The practical consequence for a buyer: if a customer wants 60 kW racks here, the conversation is about a specific hall fit-out, not about the building that opened in September 2025.

8Timeline

  • Equinix announces a Chennai expansion with an initial investment of about $65 million and a total site capacity of 4,950 cabinets at full build-out.
  • CN1 opens, inaugurated by the Tamil Nadu chief minister. 800 cabinets and a 3.6 MW initial IT load in a four-storey building on nearly six acres at Siruseri. US$69 million initial investment. Full build described as 4,250 cabinets.
  • Company executives state that the site will scale to more than 4,950 cabinets with an IT load of roughly 25 MW over four to five years, timed to customer demand.
  • Equinix opens MB3 in Mumbai, taking its cumulative India investment to $365 million across five buildings, and says it is in talks to acquire further Mumbai land.
  • CN1 is operating. No further phase has been announced. The remaining 3,450 to 4,150 cabinets and about 21 MW of design capacity are unbuilt and undated beyond a four to five year horizon

9Procurement

Procurement window and scope
Gridvik assessment · 22 Oct 2026
This record
A live 3.6 MW retail colocation building with roughly 21 MW of further design capacity and four storeys to fit out
What is already installed
Phase one electrical and mechanical plant for 800 cabinets, with the shell for the full four-storey build
What comes next
The remaining halls: precision cooling, busway, UPS and switchgear, plus the liquid-cooling provision when a dense customer signs
Power constraint
The adjacent dedicated substation being built by the state utility determines the pace of everything after phase one
Who buys
Equinix India, a subsidiary of a Nasdaq-listed company with a standard global equipment specification and vendor list
Why this is a hard sell
Equinix buys to a global standard, from global vendors, usually on framework agreements. A new Indian supplier enters through a localisation requirement, not a price pitch
Order window
Phases two to four: 2027 to 2030. Timed explicitly to customer demand, not to a construction programme
Procurement heat
Moderate and steady. Equinix is a repeat buyer, which is worth more than a large one-off
All estimates are labelled as estimates. No tender dates claimed, no private contact data published.
Unlock GridFeed →

Rows with a lock are the paid layer.

10Assumptions and method

What is sourced
The opening date, inauguration, site, acreage, storeys, cabinet counts, investment, uptime target, interconnection services, liquid-cooling readiness, and the state utility substation
What is sourced from coverage rather than the release
The 3.6 MW live figure and the 25 MW full-build figure. Equinix did not put megawatts in its press release. Both figures are attributed to the company in trade and state coverage
What is derived
All density figures, the per-megawatt costs, the MB3 comparison, and the observation about retail colocation economics
Capacity figure used
3.6 MW, IT load, additive. Contributes to Gridvik’s live bucket
Additivity rule
Additive as a distinct operating facility. The 25 MW at full build is carried as a plan and is not added to any total
Currency
₹88.40 to the US dollar, fixed quarterly. The $69 million converts to about ₹610 crore; Indian coverage reported ₹574 crore, a difference within the range of the exchange rates used that week

11Limits and open questions

The central gap
The operator does not publish megawatts. Both figures used here come from coverage, not from the company’s own formal disclosure
Phase dates
The company says four to five years, timed to demand. No phase two date exists
Tenants
Named categories only — banks, IT firms, pharmaceutical companies, OTT platforms and manufacturers. No customers are named
Utilisation
Not disclosed. Whether the 800 cabinets are full is unknown
Liquid cooling
A design provision. No installed liquid-cooled capacity is described
Cost per megawatt
The $19.2 million figure is phase one against a building designed for far more. It overstates the true per-megawatt cost of the finished building and is labelled as a phase-one figure throughout
What we will not claim
No tenant names, no utilisation, no installed liquid cooling, no phase dates, and no megawatt figure presented as the operator’s own disclosure

12Sources

This record was compiled entirely from publicly available sources, cross-checked against one another.

Equinix press release·Equinix investor relations·Equinix India statements·PR Newswire·Businessworld·New Indian Express·Economic Times·DatacenterDynamics·Data Centre Magazine·Telematics Wire·Express Computer·Rediff·StockTitan

Gridvik does not publish source URLs on record pages; citations are retained in the internal source register and are available on request.

What this page is, and what it is not

A facility record for an operating building whose operator reports in cabinets rather than megawatts. Every derived figure is labelled, and the two megawatt figures are attributed to their actual source.

Corrections are free and published with a date.