Get Free Teaser
MoU-stage record · Verified 26 Oct 2026

Cortex Data Centres — Navi Mumbai, MaharashtraCortex Data Centres, a TCG venture · Navi Mumbai per state listings · capacity undisclosed

Record PRJ-054Maharashtra — Navi MumbaiTier D — announcement only9 public sources cross-checkedSite not finalised
MoU onlyNo MW disclosedComputing infrastructureNational ambition is separate
₹60,990cr
Proposed
$6.90bn
At ₹88.40
0
MW disclosed
871MW
Implied at ₹70 cr/MW
10,000
Jobs claimed
₹6.10cr
Proposed per job

On 1 October 2026, at the launch of Maharashtra’s Invest Maharashtra authority, Cortex Data Centres — a subsidiary of New York–headquartered The Chatterjee Group — was listed against a ₹60,990 crore proposal for computing infrastructure in Navi Mumbai and 10,000 jobs. It was the largest data-centre line in a single-day MoU event worth ₹8.57 lakh crore. No capacity was published. Three weeks later the company formally announced its entry into the sector with a 2 GW national ambition and stated that no location had been finalised. This record holds those two statements at the same time, because they are both on the public record and they do not agree.

1At a glance

Proponent
Cortex Data Centres, described on its own site as a TCG venture. Parent The Chatterjee Group is a New York–headquartered private equity and industrial holding group with more than $4 billion of deployed capital across petrochemicals, life sciences, technology, financial services and real estate
Announced where
Listed in the Maharashtra government’s Invest Maharashtra MoU round-up on 1 October 2026; reported by Financial Express, ETDatacenters, DQ India and Construction World between 3 and 8 October
Investment
₹60,990 crore, about $6.90 billion at ₹88.40 to the dollar
Declared capacity
None for this project. No megawatt, rack count, floor area or building count has been published by any party
Location
Two accounts. State listings and the Financial Express round-up place it in Navi Mumbai. The company, in its own launch coverage on 22 October, said no locations had been finalised
Jobs claimed
10,000, per the state MoU listing. That is ₹6.10 crore of proposed investment per job
Company ambition
2 GW of AI-ready capacity across India’s Golden Quadrilateral, built on land parcels the group already owns. Not mapped to this MoU by the company
Schedule
None. The only date offered is operational readiness within 18 months of first shovel — which is a duration, not a deadline
Additivity
Flagged unresolved. Contributes nothing to any total: nothing is built and no capacity is stated

2₹60,990 crore and no megawatt

This is the largest single data-centre number to come out of the 1 October event and it carries less engineering detail than a ₹1,500 crore approval. There is a rupee figure, a district, a job count, and nothing else.

At ₹70 cr a MWL&T and HCLTech territory871 MWAt ₹56 cr a MWthe CtrlS Chennai rate1,089 MWAt ₹52 cr a MWthe Yotta D1 rate1,173 MWCortex national ambition2 GW, not tied to this MoU2,000 MWArithmetic on the ₹60,990 crore MoU value. No megawatt figure has been published for Navi Mumbai, so none is recorded.
Figure 1Three build rates from records already in this registry, applied to the published MoU value. The red bar is the company’s national ambition, which is a different number for a different scope and is shown only to make the gap visible.

The spread — 871 to 1,173 MW — is the honest range for what this money could build at rates that have actually been paid in India. It is not a forecast and it is not carried into the registry. What it does is price the announcement: a ₹60,990 crore commitment with no megawatt attached is roughly a 900 MW to 1.2 GW programme, or it is something else entirely.

Why the capacity is missing

State MoU lists carry rupees and jobs because those are what a state can count. They do not carry megawatts because a state does not design the building.

In this registry, a record with rupees but no megawatts is not a smaller version of a data centre. It is a financing intention. Until a plot and a design exist, the capacity is a number waiting to be chosen.

3The 2 GW that this money cannot buy

Three weeks after the MoU was reported, Cortex announced its entry into the data-centre business: 2 GW of AI-ready capacity across India’s Golden Quadrilateral, developed on land parcels the group already holds, with the first facility ready 18 months after construction starts and 51% green power. The CEO is Rahul Sharma. The company explicitly said there is no fixed number of facilities yet.

The important point is arithmetic, and it is not in any of the coverage.

What 2 GW costs against what was announced
MeasureValuen
Capital needed for 2 GW at ₹52 crore/MW₹1,04,000 crorethe cheapest rate paid in this registry
Capital needed for 2 GW at ₹70 crore/MW₹1,40,000 crorethe upper end of observed build cost
Announced MoU value₹60,990 crore43.6% to 58.6% of the above
₹60,990 crore expressed per megawatt, if it were the whole 2 GW₹30.5 crore per MWbelow the cost of building a shell, let alone fitting one out

So the MoU cannot be financing the 2 GW. Either the ₹60,990 crore is a first tranche against a much larger eventual programme, or the 2 GW is a decade-long aspiration that will be funded from somewhere else. Both are legitimate. What is not legitimate is quoting the ₹60,990 crore and the 2 GW in the same sentence, which is how the two items now circulate.

The trap in this record

Treating ₹60,990 crore and 2 GW as one project produces ₹30.5 crore a megawatt — a figure that would imply Indian data centres cost less than half what they actually cost.

Gridvik records zero megawatts for this record. If the 2 GW ever acquires a site list, it becomes a programme of separate records, not one number.

4Who TCG and Cortex are

The counterparty matters more than usual here, because a ₹60,990 crore proposal from a first-time operator has to be read against what the parent can actually do.

The two entities on the record
EntityPosition
The Chatterjee GroupNew York–headquartered private equity and industrial holding group. More than $4 billion deployed. Portfolio in petrochemicals, life sciences, technology, financial services and real estate. This is a capital allocator, not a data-centre operator
Cortex Data CentresThe group’s data-centre subsidiary, described on its own site as a TCG venture. No operating campus, no published customer, no disclosed rack count
Land positionThe company says it will use existing land parcels held by the group. No parcel has been identified, sized or valued
Operating experienceNot stated in any public material. This is a first campus for the entity

Existing land is a real advantage and should not be dismissed — site acquisition and permitting are where Indian data-centre schedules usually die. But land is not power, and power is what a 900 MW to 1.2 GW programme needs. Maharashtra has been generous with MoUs and slower with energisation.

5Navi Mumbai: two accounts

Two official-sounding statements, twenty-one days apart.

What each side said
DateSourceStatement
1 October 2026Maharashtra government MoU listingCortex Data Centres, ₹60,990 crore, Navi Mumbai, 10,000 jobs
3–5 October 2026Financial Express, ETDatacenters, DQ IndiaRepeats Navi Mumbai and the value, citing the state list. No capacity, no plot, no counterparty detail
22 October 2026Cortex launch coverage, BusinessLine and BW BusinessworldCompany announces its sector entry. No locations finalised. First facility ready 18 months after construction begins

This is not a contradiction that implies anyone lied. A state publishes where it wants an investment to land; a company announces when it is ready. But a supplier reading "Navi Mumbai" as a confirmed micro-market would be planning against a decision that has not been made. Navi Mumbai is plausible — the group’s land, the state’s incentives and the customer base all point there — and it is not confirmed.

For anyone selling into this programme, the practical consequence is simple: there is no parcel to visit and no substation to survey. Everything below the state level is still open.

6The 18-month claim

Eighteen months from first shovel to operational readiness is fast for India and not impossible. Yotta, CtrlS and AdaniConneX have all delivered phases inside comparable windows. What makes the claim hard to assess here is that no shovel date exists, so the promise cannot be tested — 18 months from an unnamed start date is not a schedule.

MoU01Company launch02Site03Power sanction04Shovel05Live06Navy = verified · Red = current stage · Grey = not yet evidenced

Two of six stages are evidenced. The four that decide whether a data centre exists are not. That is the whole status of this record, and it is why it carries zero megawatts and zero capital deployed.

The 51% green-power target deserves the same treatment. In this market it has become a standard clause — Trentar, ReNew and Cortex all announced the same figure within eight days of each other. None of the three has published a power purchase agreement, a generation source, an open-access approval or a storage duration. The number is a design intent, and it will be the hardest part of the programme to deliver.

7Timeline

  • Maharashtra launches Invest Maharashtra and lists 67 MoUs worth ₹8.57 lakh crore. Cortex Data Centres appears against ₹60,990 crore for computing infrastructure in Navi Mumbai with 10,000 jobs claimed.
  • Financial Express, ETDatacenters, DQ India and Construction World report the Cortex line. All repeat the state figures. None publishes a megawatt, a plot or an owner of the computing capacity
  • Cortex announces its entry into the data-centre sector: 2 GW AI-ready across the Golden Quadrilateral, on existing group land, 51% green, first facility 18 months after construction starts, no locations finalised
  • No site, capacity, power sanction, financing structure, EPC contractor or schedule is in the public domain

8Procurement

Procurement window and scope
Gridvik assessment · 26 Oct 2026
What would be bought
Shell and core, MV and HV distribution, transformers, chillers or CDUs, cooling towers, BMS and EPMS, security, fire suppression, and — at AI density — liquid cooling distribution and coolant loops
Likely window
No date exists. On the company’s own 18-month rule, and assuming a site decision inside two quarters, meaningful equipment orders would cluster in 2028
Decision stage
Not started — no site, no design, no EPC appointment
Who to approach
The company, not the state. The state cannot buy a chiller. Cortex has no published procurement contact, which means the approach is the CEO office
Quality of evidence
Low. One MoU listing and one launch announcement. Nothing technical
Our confidence
Low on capacity and site, high on the rupee figure — the state published it
All estimates are labelled as estimates. No tender dates claimed, no private contact data published.
Unlock GridFeed →

9Assumptions and method

Every figure on this page and where it comes from
FigureBasisConfidence
₹60,990 croreMaharashtra MoU listing, repeated by Financial Express, ETDatacenters, DQ India, Construction WorldHigh — four outlets, one origin
Navi MumbaiState listing only. Company says no location finalisedLow
2 GW national ambitionCortex launch coverage, 22 October 2026High as a statement, zero as a plan
18 months from first shovelCompany statementStatement only; no start date
871 / 1,089 / 1,173 MWGridvik arithmetic: ₹60,990 crore ÷ ₹70, ₹56, ₹52 crore per MW. Build rates drawn from L&T Sriperumbudur, CtrlS Chennai and Yotta D1 recordsArithmetic, not recorded
₹30.5 crore per MW₹60,990 crore ÷ 2,000 MW. Shown to reject the pairing, not to value the projectArithmetic
$6.90 billion₹60,990 crore ÷ 88.40. Fixed quarterly rate, no live FXArithmetic
10,000 jobsState MoU listingUnverified

10Limits and open questions

What Gridvik will not do
We will not assign megawatts. The implied range is arithmetic on the published rupees and is labelled as such. It is not in the registry total and will not enter one until a capacity figure is published
The question nobody has asked publicly
Who builds it, and with what money. ₹60,990 crore is not on the parent’s balance sheet and no lender, joint-venture partner or EPC contractor has been named
Second question
Whether this is one campus or several. The company says there is no fixed number of facilities. A ₹60,990 crore figure covering an unspecified count of buildings is not a project, it is a budget
Third question
What the state has actually committed. The MoU facilitation language covers permissions, registrations, clearances and incentives. No land, no power allocation and no fiscal value has been published
Why this record still matters
Because it is the largest number in the wave, and because a capital allocator with $4 billion deployed and existing land is a more credible entrant than most MoU signatories. The record is early, not empty
What changes it
A named parcel, a power sanction, a capacity in megawatts, an EPC award, or a named tenant. Any one of those moves this to Tier C

11Sources

Sources: Maharashtra government Invest Maharashtra MoU listings, Financial Express, ETDatacenters, DQ India, Construction World, Moneycontrol, Times of India, BusinessLine, BW Businessworld.