Get Free Teaser
Facility record · Verified 26 Oct 2026

Nxtra PUN 1 — Kharadi, PuneNxtra by Airtel · E-Park, MIDC Knowledge Park, Kharadi, Pune 411014 · 4.5 MW listed IT power, 1,250 racks

Record PRJ-079Maharashtra — Kharadi, PuneTier D — listed only7 public sources checkedAdditive: yes, within the Pune cluster
Stage unverifiedDuplicated card valuesFacilityPUE published
4.5MW
Listed IT power
1,250
Racks
3.6kW
Per rack
1.55
Declared PUE ceiling
49.5MW
Nxtra’s Pune cluster
9%
Of Pune cluster power

PUN 1 at Kharadi is listed by Nxtra by Airtel at 4.5 MW of IT power across 1,250 racks — 3.6 kW a rack, PUE below 1.55. Two of those numbers are worth more than the rest: 4.5 MW and 1,250 racks are exactly the figures on a Noida building 1,400 kilometres away. Same capacity, same cabinet count, same density. That is not coincidence — it is a standard building the operator repeats in different cities, and knowing it exists is worth more than either card on its own.

1At a glance

Operator
Nxtra Data Limited, the data centre subsidiary of Bharti Airtel
Facility
PUN 1, Kharadi — the E-Park building at MIDC Knowledge Park, Pune 411014
Listed capacity
4.5 MW of IT power across 1,250 racks
Density
3.6 kW a rack. Second lowest in the Pune cluster, and identical to a Noida building
Efficiency
Declared PUE below 1.55
Position in cluster
The smallest of four Pune cards at 9% of the cluster’s 49.5 MW
Status
Stage unverified on the operator’s card. Directory listings describe the site as operating
Not disclosed
Commissioning date, current load, tenant list and water source
Additivity
Additive within Nxtra’s 49.5 MW Pune cluster

2The card that appears twice

The Pune page publishes four cards. Read them next to the operator’s Noida page and one of them repeats.

Two cities, one specification
CardCityMWRackskW a rackPUE
PUN 1Pune, Kharadi4.51,2503.6below 1.55
NCR 1Noida4.51,2503.6below 1.55
PUN 3Pune, Hinjewadi41,0004.0below 1.55
PUN 2Pune, Hinjewadi174,0004.25below 1.55
PUN 4Pune, Hinjewadi242,5009.6below 1.55

Two buildings in two states, one at 4.5 MW across 1,250 racks and the other at 4.5 MW across 1,250 racks. The likeliest explanation is not that the numbers were copied — it is that the company designs a repeatable building to a standard size and drops it wherever a market needs one. That is how a colocation operator scales, and it is why the same round numbers keep surfacing across the estate.

It matters commercially because it tells a vendor what to expect next. A 4.5 MW, 1,250-rack shell has a known bill of materials: a fixed cooling capacity, a fixed switchgear package, a fixed UPS count. Anyone selling into Nxtra can size an opportunity off the specification rather than off the site visit. It also tells a buyer of this intelligence that these cards are design standards, not measurements.

The number that repeats is the number that will be built again

4.5 MW and 1,250 racks appears in Pune and in Noida. Where the operator builds its next mid-size hall, expect the same pair.

The counter-example is PUN 4 at 9.6 kW a rack — a different product for a different tenant.

3Kharadi and what the directories say

Kharadi is Pune’s eastern corridor: the original enterprise data centre address in the city, close to the airport and to the offices that buy from it. It is also where the public record disagrees with itself.

Four published versions of one building
Source typeWhat it says
The operator’s card4.5 MW of IT power, 1,250 racks, PUE below 1.55
Directory listings3 MW of total power at MIDC Knowledge Park, Kharadi
A second directory4.8 MW total power, 51,921 m² gross building, 2,915 m² of colocation space
A third directory3 MW, 270,000 sq ft, PUE 1.50, maximum rack density 30 kW, air and liquid cooling, N+1

Three of those four give a different power figure, and every one gives a different floor area. None is necessarily wrong: a card may quote IT load, a directory may quote total facility power, and a third may quote a nameplate capacity that includes a generator. Gridvik records the operator’s card because it is the only number the owner of the building puts its name to, and notes the spread because it is wide enough to change a valuation.

The 30 kW maximum rack density claim deserves a sentence of its own. If a cabinet in this building can take 30 kW, and 1,250 cabinets share 4.5 MW, then the average cabinet is loaded at 3.6 kW — one eighth of the ceiling. A maximum and an average are two different things, and the gap between them is the commercial space in which a liquid cooling vendor either does or does not have a customer.

4Pune, the second largest cluster

Add all four Pune cards and the cluster is 49.5 MW across 8,750 racks — larger than Chennai at 46 MW and larger than Bengaluru at 45.4 MW.

PUN 4 — Hinjewadi 324 MW, 2,500 racks24 MWPUN 2 — Hinjewadi 117 MW, 4,000 racks17 MWPUN 1 — Kharadi4.5 MW, 1,250 racks4.5 MWPUN 3 — Hinjewadi 24 MW, 1,000 racks4 MW49.5 MW across 8,750 racks. Pune is the operator’s second largest cluster, ahead of Chennai and Bengaluru, and it is the one all four cards give a PUE for.
Figure 1Four Pune cards. The two smallest together carry 2,250 racks; the two largest carry 6,500.
The five large clusters
ClusterMWRackskW a rack
Mumbai716,90010.3
Pune49.58,7505.7
Chennai46about 5,400 stated for one building5.0
Bengaluru45.49,8004.6
Delhi NCR38.58,0504.8
Total, five clusters250.4——

That last row is the finding. The operator’s own homepage reports 230+ MW of total power capacity across 66 cities and 120-plus edge sites. Five large clusters alone add to 250.4 MW before a single edge site is counted, which is more than the headline itself.

The national number is therefore not a sum of the cards — it is a rounded headline that has drifted behind the facility page. Gridvik uses the cards for cluster arithmetic and the headline for nothing. When a company raises a billion dollars on the strength of a capacity number, the difference between a card sum and a slogan is not an academic point.

5Timeline

  • Nxtra signs a memorandum with the Maharashtra industrial development corporation for new campuses in Mumbai and Pune
  • A $673 million expansion programme describes a Pune campus of 21 MW of IT power across 2,200 racks, operating
  • The Kharadi building is developed in the eastern corridor and listed as PUN 1
  • The operator lists PUN 1 at 4.5 MW across 1,250 racks with a declared PUE below 1.55
  • No commissioning date, current load or tenant name for this building in the public record

6Procurement

Procurement window and scope
Gridvik assessment · 26 Oct 2026
What this site buys
Mid-density infrastructure for a 3.6 kW average cabinet: containment, efficient chillers, UPS, switchgear, DCIM
What it will not buy
Liquid cooling at scale, despite a published 30 kW rack ceiling. Nothing in a 4.5 MW hall forces it
Why this building matters to a vendor
It is a repeatable design. Winning the specification here means winning it in Noida and in the next city the operator enters
Account structure
Nxtra’s national engineering and procurement function, with the Pune site team executing
Likely window
Refresh. The operator’s new capital is going to AI campuses in Mumbai, Chennai and Kolkata; Pune is described as an existing facility
Quality of evidence
Good on capacity and PUE, poor on stage and floor area — four published versions of the building exist
Our confidence
High on 4.5 MW, 1,250 racks and PUE. Low on current load
All estimates are labelled as estimates. No tender dates claimed, no private contact data published.
Unlock GridFeed →

7Limits and open questions

What this record is
A 4.5 MW, 1,250-rack building in Pune’s original eastern corridor, at a specification the operator repeats in other cities
What it is not
A dated commissioning, a current load, or the 3 MW that three separate directories report
What Gridvik will not do
We will not average the operator’s 4.5 MW with a directory’s 3 MW, and we will not describe a 30 kW ceiling as if it were a 30 kW average
First question
When was this building commissioned, and is it full? Kharadi is the oldest Pune address and the operator has since built all its new capacity at Hinjewadi
Second question
Is the 3 MW figure an IT load, a facility load or an installed generator capacity? The answer decides whether this hall has room to grow or is already at its ceiling
Why this record matters
It anchors the Pune cluster, it exposes a repeated building specification, and it is the clearest example in the registry of an average density sitting one eighth below a published maximum
What changes the tier
A commissioning date, an occupancy figure, or a floor-area statement from the operator

8Sources

Sources: Nxtra Pune data centre page, Nxtra by Airtel site, PeeringDB facility register, DataCenterMap, DataCenterHawk, DataCenter Dynamics Infra on the Nxtra expansion programme, Airtel investor releases.