STT GDC Jaipur 1 is 6 MW of IT load, ready for service from 3 June 2026. Capacity, basis, status and date — four things that almost no other record in this file has, published together. This is the best-specified data centre record in the registry, and it is one of only two STT records anywhere that counts. It is also the entirety of the Rajasthan data centre market in this file: one building, six megawatts. Every other STT page in this run needed a caveat. This one does not, and that contrast is the point.
1At a glance
2Four facts, published together
The standard this registry has been asking for across thirty pages, met in one record.
| Fact | Jaipur 1 | Most STT records in this file |
|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 6 MW | a number, usually unlabelled |
| Basis | IT load, stated | unstated in the majority |
| Status | ready for service | stage unverified across roughly twenty buildings |
| Date | 3 June 2026 | absent on almost every card |
| Counted | yes | two records out of about thirty |
Everything on the left of that table could be published for every building in the estate with no competitive cost. A capacity, a basis, a status and a date is not commercially sensitive — it is the minimum description of an asset.
The reason it matters is that these four facts are the difference between a directory and a dataset. Without them you have a list of names and numbers. With them you have a model that can be dated, compared and forecast from.
3A six megawatt market
Rajasthan has exactly one data centre record in this registry, and this is it.
| Record | MW | Status | Counted |
|---|---|---|---|
| STT GDC Jaipur 1 | 6 | ready for service 3 Jun 2026 | yes |
| Anything else | nothing | — | — |
| State total | 6 MW | — | 6 MW |
Six megawatts is the smallest state total in the registry, and it is also the cleanest — because it is a single building with a published date, there is nothing to reconcile and nothing to dispute.
That is a useful lesson about data quality: the smallest markets are often the most reliable. A one-record state can be verified completely. A 242-record registry cannot, which is why the methodology matters more than the volume.
4Ready for service, not commissioned
The status word matters, and the operator chose it precisely.
| Status | What it asserts | What it does not assert |
|---|---|---|
| Ready for service | the facility can accept a customer and provide service | that any customer has taken capacity |
| Commissioned | systems tested and accepted by the operator or a third party | commercial availability |
| Operational | in service | that it is full |
| Under construction | being built | anything about completion |
"Ready for service" is the honest commercial milestone: the building works and can be sold, and nothing is claimed about occupancy. This registry records it as the operator’s stated milestone and does not infer a commissioning certificate behind it.
That distinction matters more than it sounds. A building that is ready for service could be entirely empty, and a building that is operational could be entirely full. Only the operator knows which, and only the operator can say.
5What this record proves
The contrast between this page and the thirty that preceded it is the argument for the whole product.
| STT Mumbai portfolio | STT Jaipur 1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Published capacity | 133 MW | 6 MW |
| Basis stated | no | yes |
| Status stated | no | yes |
| Date published | no | yes |
| Counted | 0 MW | 6 MW |
| Pages needed to explain it | eight | one |
A 6 MW building with four published facts counts in full. A 133 MW portfolio with none of them counts for nothing. That is not a coincidence — it is the rule working exactly as designed, applied to a company that is inconsistent about disclosure.
The lesson for the operator is that publishing more would make them countable. The lesson for the buyer is that the records which look small are often the ones you can actually rely on.
Capacity, basis, status, date — four fields. Every building in India could carry all four, and the first operator to do it becomes the reference dataset.
Jaipur shows it costs nothing to publish. It is the single most quotable record in this registry.
6Procurement
7Limits and open questions
- No racks, floor area or PUE. Even the best-specified record in the file stops short of density.
- No occupancy. Ready for service says nothing about how full it is.
- Single source, though the date makes it verifiable.
- Rajasthan has no second record, so a state total of 6 MW is one operator’s one building. That is accurate and also fragile — if the building is withdrawn, the state has no data centre record left.
- What would close it. A rack count and a PUE. Two figures and this becomes a complete facility record, not just a complete disclosure.
8Sources
Sources: STT GDC India Jaipur city page, STT GDC India facility pages for Jaipur, STT GDC India corporate site, and Indian market commentary on the Rajasthan data centre market and state industrial policy.