Get Free Teaser
Facility record · Verified 26 Oct 2026

Sify Rabale Tower 5 — where the campus total comes fromSify Technologies · Rabale, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra · 43.3 MW design · 30.24 MW installed · 2,500 racks · G+8 · 220 kV GIS

Record PRJ-222Maharashtra — Rabale, Navi MumbaiTier B — operating, design against installed6 public sources checkedAdditive: no — child of PRJ-029, counts 0
Operational, hyperscale-ready, G+82,500 racks on a 220 kV GIS substation43.3 designed against 30.24 installedCampus total of 96.94 likely uses the design figure
43.3MW
Designed
30.24MW
Installed
12.6MW
Gap
2,500
Racks
17.3kW
Per rack at design
13%
Of campus built

Tower 5 is the newest building at Sify’s Rabale campus: a G+8 hyperscale tower with an on-premise 220 kV GIS substation, 2,500 racks, and a design of 43.30 MW of IT power. A third-party tracker records 30.24 MW installed at the same 30 June 2025 date the operator uses. The campus total of 96.94 MW across five towers reconciles to the design figure, not the installed one: towers 1 to 4 account for 54.1 MW, and 96.94 minus 54.1 leaves 42.84 — Tower 5 at design. That makes this page the place where 12.6 MW of Sify’s published built capacity stops being a measurement and becomes an intention.

1At a glance

Facility
Rabale Tower 5, Mumbai 03 campus, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra
Parent
PRJ-029 Rabale campus; aggregate headlined on PRJ-221
Status
Operational; G+8 layout, hyperscale-ready
Designed IT power
43.30 MW per Sify Infinit Spaces as of 30 June 2025
Stated by Sify Technologies
43.2 MW, rounded
Brochure figure
38.8 MW with 2,500+ racks, September 2024
Installed
30.24 MW, third-party tracker, 30 June 2025
Racks
2,500
Density at design
17.3 kW per rack
Density at installed
12.1 kW per rack — which matches the 10 to 13 kW stated for towers 7 to 10
Substation
220 kV GIS serving towers 4 and 5
Build
6,300 mm floor to floor, 2,100 kg per sq m floor load
Share of the 96.94 MW campus total
44% at design
Counted in this registry
0 MW — included in the parent aggregate

2Forty-three point three against thirty point two four

Designed, Sify Infinit Spacesas of 30 June 202543.3 MWRounded, Sify Technologies pages202643.2 MWBrochure of September 20242,500+ racks38.8 MWInstalled, third-party trackeras of 30 June 202530.24 MWThirteen megawatts separate the design figure from the installed figure. The campus total of 96.94 MW appears to use the top bar.
Figure 1 — four published figures for one tower. The 12.6 MW between the top and bottom bar is the difference between a design and a delivery.
The four figures and what each measures
FigureSource and dateMWScope
DesignedSify Infinit Spaces, 30 Jun 202543.30Design IT power of the tower as built
RoundedSify Technologies, 202643.2Same figure rounded down on the campus pages
BrochureSep 202438.8With 2,500+ racks, described as operational from September 2023
InstalledThird-party tracker, 30 Jun 202530.24Equipment actually energised inside the design
This registry—0Included in the parent campus aggregate

The word designed is doing a lot of work in Sify’s own disclosure. The Infinit Spaces page says the campus had 96.94 MW of built IT power and that Tower 5 was designed for 43.30 MW. A tower can be built with a 43.3 MW design and hold 30.24 MW of installed switchgear and PDUs; both statements are true at once.

The installed figure also explains something the design figure cannot. 30.24 MW across 2,500 racks is 12.1 kW a rack, and Sify’s own factsheet for towers 7 to 10 quotes a power density of 10 to 13 kW per rack. The installed number fits the published density; the design number does not, unless the racks are counted only where the high-density pods sit.

The single most consequential open item in the Sify family

If Tower 5 is 30.24 MW installed rather than 43.3 MW, then the campus built total is 84.34 MW, not 96.94 MW — a 13% overstatement against the figure used in every Sify capacity discussion since 2025.

This registry does not resolve it. The 4.32 MW and 30.24 MW installed figures come from a third-party tracker, and the operator has published neither. Both numbers are in the public record on the same date. The page prints both and prices the difference.

For a buyer the practical question is not which is true. It is which number the seller will use in a term sheet, and whether the contract prices megawatts of design or megawatts of delivered load.

3How 96.94 was calculated

The arithmetic is short and it is the reason this page exists. Sify’s five towers, with their individually published capacities from third-party specification sources:

The tower-by-tower build-up
TowersMWCumulative
Towers 1 and 2 combined22.022.00
Tower 324.046.00
Tower 48.154.10
Tower 5 at installed30.2484.34
Tower 5 at design43.3097.40
Operator campus total—96.94

Towers 1 to 4 sum to 54.1 MW. The operator’s campus total is 96.94 MW. The residual is 42.84 MW — which lands within 0.5 MW of Tower 5’s 43.30 MW design figure and 12.6 MW above its installed figure.

That is not a rounding difference. It is the difference between a campus that is 26% built against its 377 MW design, and one that is 22% built. Small in percentage terms, large in rupees: 12.6 MW at the replacement band of ₹51.4 to 60.1 crore per MW is ₹650 to ₹760 crore of plant that may be designed rather than installed.

The audit any capacity buyer should run

Take the operator’s campus total. Subtract every individually published tower figure you can find. If the residual matches a design number rather than an installed number, the total is a design total.

It takes ten minutes with a spreadsheet and it is the difference between buying 96.94 MW and buying 84.34 MW on the same address.

Gridvik runs this test on every campus in the registry. Rabale and Chennai 02 are the two where it changes the number materially.

4What the tower is worth

Tower 5 priced at three capacities
BasisMWAt ₹55.3 cr per MW
Designed43.30₹2,394 cr
Brochure38.80₹2,146 cr
Installed30.24₹1,672 cr
Difference, design minus installed13.06₹722 cr

₹55.3 crore per MW is Yotta’s disclosed D4 build cost, the closest comparable in this registry for a large purpose-built hyperscale tower. The band across five independent operators is ₹51.4 to 60.1 crore per MW. Apply the low end to the design figure and the tower is ₹2,222 crore; apply the high end to the installed figure and it is ₹1,817 crore. Every number in that range is an estimate and is labelled as one.

What is not an estimate is the ratio. One tower is 44% of the campus built total, 2,500 racks, and roughly a third of a billion dollars of plant by the midpoint of the band. It is also the tower that carries the 220 kV GIS connection, hosts the AI-ready liquid-cooled capability and made Rabale the first NVIDIA DGX-Ready certified data centre in India, in 2024.

So the tower is not the problem. The vocabulary is. Sify publishes designed capacity in a sentence that reads as built capacity, and the entire campus total inherits the gap.

5Procurement

Procurement window and scope
Gridvik assessment · 22 Oct 2026
What to buy here
The newest hyperscale tower in Navi Mumbai: 2,500 racks, 220 kV GIS, liquid-cooling capable, NVIDIA DGX-Ready campus
Where it is
Rabale, Navi Mumbai. Tower 5 of the Mumbai 03 campus
Who holds the answer
Sify Infinit Spaces for the asset; Sify Technologies for tenancy and the GPU cloud offer
The one question
How many of the 30.24 MW installed are energised and how many of the 2,500 racks are available at 13 kW or above
Why they will answer it
An operator with an IPO process that needs an audited built-capacity figure
Gridvik estimate
Installed may be 12.6 MW below the published campus total. Labelled arithmetic on third-party and operator figures
What changes it
A tower-level energisation disclosure, or a filing that states installed rather than designed IT power
All estimates are labelled as estimates. No tender dates claimed, no private contact data published.
Unlock GridFeed →

6Limits and open questions

  • Four published capacities — 30.24, 38.8, 43.2 and 43.3 MW. The registry counts zero here because Tower 5 is inside the PRJ-029 campus aggregate.
  • The installed figure is third-party. 30.24 MW comes from a tracker, not from Sify. It is dated to the same 30 June 2025 as the operator’s design figure.
  • The 12.6 MW gap is arithmetic, not a finding of fact. It is what remains when the tower figures are subtracted from the campus total.
  • No PUE, no energised-rack count and no occupancy figure are published for Tower 5.
  • The brochure describes the tower as operational from September 2023 and elsewhere as newly launched in 2025 — a two-year ambiguity in the delivery date.
  • Cost per megawatt is an estimate using Yotta D4 as the closest comparable, not a disclosed Sify figure.
  • What would close it. One sentence from Sify: installed, energised IT power of Tower 5 at the latest measurement date.

7Sources

Sources: Sify Infinit Spaces Mumbai data centre page dated 30 June 2025; the Sify Rabale data centre page with the 43.2 MW and 96.94 MW figures; the Sify data centre portfolio page; the Rabale brochure of September 2024; the Tower 5 to Tower 10 factsheet; and ArusGrid, which records 30.24 MW installed at 30 June 2025 and tower-level capacities for towers 1 to 4.