Get Free Teaser
Facility record · Verified 26 Oct 2026

Sify Chennai 01 — Tidel ParkSify Technologies · Tidel Park, Chennai, Tamil Nadu · 3.58 MW · 500 to 800+ racks · 13 floors · Built 2001

Record PRJ-223Tamil Nadu — Chennai, Tidel ParkTier B — operating, figures conflict5 public sources checkedAdditive: yes — 3.58 MW counted
Operating since 2001, 25 yearsCarrier-neutral, dual meet-me-rooms3.58, 3.6 or 4 MW500 racks or 800-plus racks, 60% apart
3.58MW
IT power
800+
Racks, one page
500
Racks, another
4.5kW
Per rack at 800
1.2%
Of Tamil Nadu
25
Years operating

Sify Chennai 01 sits inside Tidel Park, was built in 2001, and is described by third-party trackers as India’s first purpose-built data centre. It publishes 3.58 MW of IT power on the current portfolio card, 3.6 MW on the Chennai page, and 4 MW with 500 racks on the colocation page — while another Sify page gives it 800+ racks. The megawatt figures agree within 12%. The rack counts differ by 60%, and on a density calculation the rack count matters more. At 3.58 MW this building is 1.2% of Tamil Nadu's 296.6 MW counted capacity, in the state that holds the largest new AI campus pipeline in the country.

1At a glance

Facility
Sify Chennai 01, Tidel Park, Chennai, Tamil Nadu
Operator
Sify Technologies, via Sify Infinit Spaces
Built
2001, 25 years in service
Position
Described by third-party trackers as India’s first purpose-built data centre
Form
13 floors in a vertical building, not a campus
IT power
3.58 MW on the current portfolio card
Stated elsewhere
3.6 MW on the Chennai page; 4 MW on the Europe and colocation pages
Difference
0.42 MW, 12% between the highest and lowest figure
Racks
500 on one page, 800+ on another
Density at 3.58 MW
4.5 kW per rack if 800 racks; 7.2 if 500
Connectivity
Carrier-neutral, dual meet-me-rooms, multiple internet exchanges
Sibling facility
Chennai 02 at Siruseri, 25.92 MW built, a separate record
Share of Tamil Nadu's 296.6 MW
1.2%
Counted in this registry
3.58 MW — additive

2Three figures for one thirteen-floor building

Colocation services page500 racks, 4 MW4.0 MWEurope and Chennai pagesTidel Park, 3.6 MW3.6 MWPortfolio card, currentSeptember 20263.58 MWA 12% spread on a 25-year-old building. The rack count disagrees by 60%, which changes the density by more than the megawatts do.
Figure 1 — the three published capacities for Chennai 01. On a building this size the megawatt disagreement is small; the rack disagreement is not.
Each figure, its page and its scope
FigureSourceMWScope
Colocation services pageSify, undated4.0500 racks, describes a Tidel Park facility with 4 MW IT power
Chennai and Europe pagesSify, 2024 to 20263.6Tidel Park design IT power, rounded to one decimal
Portfolio cardSep 20263.58Current card figure, precise to two decimals
This registry—3.58Counted; the operator’s most precise current figure

The pattern across the Sify family repeats here: the more precise the number, the lower it is. The rounded figures are 3.6 and 4.0; the two-decimal figure is 3.58. That is what a fleet-wide measurement usually looks like when a company starts reporting to two decimals — the marketing numbers round up, the audited ones do not.

The 12% spread is not the interesting part of this record. On a building of 3.58 MW, 0.42 MW is a rounding argument. The rent is set by the racks and the connectivity, not by the megawatts.

3Five hundred racks or eight hundred

Sify publishes two rack counts for this building on two of its own pages, and the difference changes the density by more than the capacity figures do.

What each published combination implies
CapacityRackskW per rack
3.58 MW8004.5
3.58 MW5007.2
4.0 MW5008.0
4.0 MW8005.0
13 floors at 800 racks—About 62 racks per floor

Every combination lands between 4.5 and 8 kW a rack. That is the enterprise colocation range of the early 2000s, and it is the honest way to describe this building: a facility designed for cabinets drawing three to five kilowatts, now being asked to host applications that expect ten.

Sixty-two racks a floor across thirteen floors is a dense, vertical, urban data centre — a telephone-exchange model rather than the warehouse-and-yard model that every new Indian campus uses. That gives it two things no greenfield campus has: an address inside the city and fibre paths that have been in place since before the metro fibre build-out.

The rack-count test, applied honestly

When two published rack counts differ by 60%, neither is a typo. One is usually total cabinets and the other is contracted or sellable cabinets.

The inventory that matters to a buyer is the third number, which is never published: cabinets available for a new tenant today, at what density, at what rate.

Gridvik carries the published range and labels it. A single rack count would be a guess dressed as a fact.

4Chennai 01 in a 296.6 MW state

AirTrunk MAA1facility power, 2026128+ MWSTT Chennai campus68 MW at the Bangalore node row68 MWCapitaLand Ambattur 0134 MW IT of 53 MW gross34 MWSify Chennai 02 Siruseribuilt IT power, Jun 202525.92 MWSTT Chennai, second sitesmaller facility7.2 MWSify Chennai 01, Tidel Parkbuilt 2001, this record3.58 MWChennai counts 296.6 MW in this registry. The 2001 building is 1.2% of it, and it is still the site every legacy enterprise application sits in.
Figure 2 — the Chennai facility set, by published capacity. Tamil Nadu counts 296.6 MW in this registry; the 2001 building is the smallest bar on the chart and the only one inside the city core.

Tamil Nadu is the second-largest state in this registry at 296.6 MW counted, behind only Maharashtra, and Chennai is where almost all of it sits. The pipeline is not subtle: AirTrunk’s MAA1 at 128+ MW of facility power, the STT Chennai campus at 68 MW, CapitaLand’s Ambattur tower at 34 MW of IT power inside 53 MW gross, and Sify’s own Siruseri campus at 25.92 MW built against 130+ MW designed.

Against that, Chennai 01 is 3.58 MW — 1.2% of the state. And yet it is the site that holds the workloads that cannot move, because the new campuses are outside the city and this one is inside it. Siruseri is roughly 25 km south; Ambattur is in the north-west; MAA1 is further out again.

The two Sify Chennai buildings, side by side
ItemChennai 01 — Tidel ParkChennai 02 — Siruseri
Built2001Tower B 2025
Form13 floors, verticalThree-tower campus
Built IT power3.58 MW25.92 MW
Design ceilingAbout 4 MW130+ MW
Density4.5 to 8 kW per rackUp to 130 kW per rack
LocationInside the city, Tidel ParkSIPCOT IT park, about 25 km south
ProductLegacy enterprise colocationAI-ready hyperscale, liquid cooled

That table is the whole Indian data centre story in six rows. The same operator runs a 4 kW rack inside the city and a 130 kW rack 25 kilometres outside it, and both are full. Capacity counts the megawatts; the market pays for the address.

5Procurement

Procurement window and scope
Gridvik assessment · 22 Oct 2026
What to buy here
In-city Chennai colocation at low density, on a carrier-neutral site with dual meet-me-rooms and long-established fibre
Where it is
Tidel Park, Chennai. 3.58 MW, 500 to 800+ racks, 13 floors
Who holds the answer
Sify Technologies enterprise sales, Chennai; Sify Infinit Spaces for the asset
The one question
What cabinets are available today, at what kilowatts, and what the rental is per rack rather than per megawatt
Why they will answer it
A listed operator with a mature asset it needs to keep earning from
Gridvik estimate
About ₹198 crore of replacement value at 3.58 MW and ₹55.3 crore per MW. Labelled estimate
What changes it
A density upgrade, a Tidel Park lease event, or migration of anchor tenants to Siruseri
All estimates are labelled as estimates. No tender dates claimed, no private contact data published.
Unlock GridFeed →

6Limits and open questions

  • Three published capacities — 3.58, 3.6 and 4 MW, a 12% spread. The registry counts 3.58 MW.
  • Two published rack counts — 500 and 800+, a 60% spread. Neither is dated, and the density range is 4.5 to 8 kW a rack as a result.
  • No floor area is published for the data centre floors, so the 13-floor form cannot be converted into a density figure per square foot.
  • PUE is not published for this building. A 2001-era facility in a city tower will not be near the 1.4 to 1.6 range of new builds.
  • Whether Tidel Park space is leased or owned is not stated. An expiring lease would change the valuation more than any capacity question.
  • No tenant or occupancy disclosure exists for Chennai 01, so its revenue cannot be estimated from public data.
  • What would close it. One current rack count, one available-cabinet figure, and the tenure of the Tidel Park floors.

7Sources

Sources: the Sify data centre portfolio page with the 3.58 MW card figure; the Sify Chennai data centre page; the Sify Europe Chennai data centre page with the 500-rack and 4 MW specification; the Sify colocation services page with the 800-plus rack count; and third-party specifications from Baxtel and DataCenterLocations.